Abbottcallmost

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

A French awakening

Posted on 6:17 PM by Unknown
The government in France is pushing what is called "gender theory" into schools. What is this gender theory? It's the liberal theory that sex distinctions between men and women are oppressive social constructs that should be made not to matter.

If you remember, liberals believe in individual autonomy. That means that the individual has to be self-determined. But the fact of being born a man or a woman is predetermined. Therefore, liberals see this "gender binary" of male and female negatively and would prefer for the individual to choose their own individual sex identity from across a whole spectrum of "gender".

Tiberge at Gallia Watch describes gender theory this way:
a hair-raising innovation being promoted by the diabolical minister of Education, Vincent Peillon. Imagine yourself back in grade school, being informed by your teachers that you were born neutral, and that you will be free to choose your sex when you grow up

Marguerite Peeters explains it as follows:
According to the social engineers who have been fabricating the gender theory since the 1950s, the feminine and masculine identity, the ontological structure of the woman as spouse, mother and educator, the anthropological complementarity of man and woman, fatherhood, heterosexuality (“heteronormativity”, dominant in all cultures), marriage and the traditional family would not exist per se, would not be good in themselves, but would be social constructs: sociological phenomena, social functions constructed over time, stereotypes to deconstruct by way of education and culture as they are deemed discriminatory and contrary to equality.

The French elite is serious in trying to push ahead with gender theory. One French agency wishes to replace the terms "boys" and "girls" in schools in order to "prevent sexual differentiation":
Grégor Puppinck reminds us that the report by IGAS (General Inspectorate of Social Affairs) recommends "replacing the terms 'boys' and 'girls' by the neutral terms 'friends' or 'children', telling stories in which the children have two dads or mums, etc." According to the report, the aim is to "prevent sexual differentiation and the interiorisation by the children of their sexual identity."

Now, none of this is new. If you're interested I've listed many examples of liberal "gender theory" in the chapter on sex distinctions in my e-book. But what is new and encouraging is the level of resistance to gender theory that is taking place in France right now.

The first victory was that 270,000 people signed a petition against an amendment to a bill that would have made the teaching of gender theory compulsory in all French schools. That amendment was then defeated in the French senate.

In Lyon an association has been established to bring together teachers and professors in opposition to gender theory:
We are creating a new organization to be called "Teachers for Children" said Jean-Baptiste to LyonMag.com...It will aim to federate a maximum of professors and teachers, ranging from primary to preparatory classes, and mobilize all the people to fight against gender theory...We do not agree with these absolutely crazy ideas.

In Paris there was a demonstration against the gender theory:



Xavier Breton, who seems to be the most vocal member of the French National Assembly in opposing these kinds of measures, has criticised gender theory for suggesting "that man and woman are interchangeable". The Catholic Church has also criticised the theory for undermining "sexual differences that are intrinsic to humanity". Bishop Ginoux has also rightly pointed out that gender theory cannot fit within a Christian world view:
“This issue is serious and lays the foundations of a society which, by rejecting nature and thus creation, considers man to be his own creator, one who chooses his sexuality and organizes his lifestyle based on personal choice,” wrote Bishop Bernard Ginoux of Montauban this past June.

It's interesting too how people are criticising liberalism in much the same terms that I have done here at this site. Here, for instance, is a comment from Antoine Ginesty, aged 29, an art buyer:
But we fear that this law, if passed, will erode the difference between men and women. It will impose the theory that gender does not matter – with potentially calamitous consequences for the values of our society.

And many of those protesting are young people, both male and female. There's more to report about this, but I hope I've made the point for now. Liberalism is not set in stone. It's not the way that things have to be. Many thousands of ordinary people don't want it, even after decades of intense campaigning in its favour, with the media, the schools and the universities on its side.

We need in each Western country a real opposition. That doesn't just mean voting for an establishment right-wing party every three years - that won't do much at all, not when these parties are mostly liberal in philosophy anyway.

The fight is not between Labor and Liberal, or Democrat and Republican, or Labour and Conservative. It goes much deeper than this.

There is a France that wants to live and endure and another France that is set on deconstruction along the lines of a dubious theory. The living part of France is, for now at least, asserting itself and organising and leading the way.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in gender | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home
View mobile version

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • We're breaking the mould
    I had a go at completing a political compass that supposedly tells you where you fit on the political spectrum. As I suspected the compass c...
  • A new blog: Upon Hope
    It's always pleasing to be able to announce a new traditionalist blog. The latest is called Upon Hope and is being run by a Melbourne t...
  • A new party in Germany
    The breaking up of political orthodoxy is a good thing for us. So I was interested to read that a new German party, the Alternative for Ge...
  • What are the liberal advantages?
    The liberal team has done better than our team over a long period of time. Therefore, we have to carefully consider where they have managed ...
  • Lawrence Auster
    Sadly news has arrived of the passing on of Lawrence Auster. Laura Wood has written a fine tribute to him at her site. I can't write as...
  • Stay at home dads still barely register
    There are not many fathers in the U.S. who are choosing to be stay at home dads. If you look at the graph below you'll see that the numb...
  • The Senate race in Australia
    An article in The Age has reignited my interest in the forthcoming Australian elections. It seems that the smaller parties have done prefe...
  • How is history made?
    When I write a post describing a positive political strategy or some political work that is happening on the ground I often get comments tha...
  • Attractive architecture by Lutyens
    Here's a place I wouldn't mind owning. It was built in 1902 at Thakeham, West Sussex, and designed by the famous English architect S...
  • Enjoyable meeting
    We had another get together of the Eltham Traditionalists last week. Once again we had a new face and the conversation was very engaging (s...

Categories

  • Aborigines (2)
  • administrative class (1)
  • Africa (1)
  • Andrew Bolt (2)
  • architecture (8)
  • arts (17)
  • atomised individual (2)
  • authenticity (2)
  • authority (1)
  • autonomy (14)
  • Brandis (4)
  • business (1)
  • caritas (1)
  • choice (1)
  • Christianity (5)
  • classical liberalism (1)
  • common good (1)
  • connectedness (2)
  • cosmic enemy (1)
  • creative spirit (2)
  • Cultural Marxism (1)
  • dehumanisation (1)
  • delayed family formation (17)
  • diversity (3)
  • divorce (1)
  • domestic violence (4)
  • drugs (1)
  • economic man (3)
  • economy (1)
  • education (1)
  • essences (8)
  • ethnic double standard (5)
  • ethnicity (19)
  • European Union (3)
  • existentialism (1)
  • fatherhood (4)
  • femininity (8)
  • feminism (4)
  • feminism and autonomy (2)
  • feminism and equal pay (7)
  • feminism and fertility (1)
  • feminism and military (7)
  • feminism and separatism (1)
  • feminism and work (4)
  • film review (2)
  • France (2)
  • gender (37)
  • happiness (1)
  • Hegel (1)
  • history (1)
  • human nature (1)
  • human status (1)
  • identity (6)
  • immigration (3)
  • immigration and the economy (1)
  • inclusiveness (1)
  • individuality (3)
  • justice (1)
  • left liberalism (13)
  • liberalism and discrimination (3)
  • liberalism and equality (4)
  • liberalism and freedom (9)
  • liberalism and individualism (9)
  • liberalism and nationalism (20)
  • liberalism and neutrality (3)
  • liberalism and non-discrimination (2)
  • liberalism and social solidarity (7)
  • liberalism and tolerance (3)
  • love (3)
  • male income (2)
  • marriage (16)
  • masculinity (6)
  • men's rights (2)
  • misanthropy (1)
  • morality (18)
  • motherhood (11)
  • multiculturalism (4)
  • music (2)
  • nationalism (3)
  • nihilism (2)
  • nominalism (1)
  • ontology (1)
  • paid leave (3)
  • patriarchy theory (3)
  • philosophy (1)
  • poetry (2)
  • polygamy (1)
  • pride (3)
  • privilege (10)
  • progress (1)
  • provider role (1)
  • rationalisation hamster (1)
  • rationalism (1)
  • reason & truth (1)
  • reductionism (2)
  • refugees (3)
  • relationships (16)
  • religion (21)
  • right liberalism (26)
  • rights (1)
  • same sex marriage (3)
  • Scandinavia (12)
  • science and gender (1)
  • scientism (1)
  • sexual liberation (3)
  • sexual morality (4)
  • sexuality (1)
  • social offices (1)
  • songs (1)
  • the family (25)
  • the good (1)
  • the Other (1)
  • the past (1)
  • timing (2)
  • traditionalist community (1)
  • traditionalist conservatism (1)
  • trivial aims (4)
  • undefined family (2)
  • virtues (5)
  • welfare (1)
  • whiteness studies (7)
  • women priests (1)

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (186)
    • ►  September (12)
    • ►  August (24)
    • ►  July (29)
    • ▼  June (24)
      • Did the institutions in 42 really need marching th...
      • Another significant Benedict quote
      • Murders of Afrikaner farmers
      • A successful meeting
      • The change at the top
      • Depression in Wales
      • Dissociation, repression, distancing
      • Not bad for an ad!
      • A quick reminder
      • Women forced onto fishing boats? Not quite.
      • Cambridge feminists on display
      • The Antigones
      • Challenging Amnesty
      • A Viking objects
      • Norway introduces conscription for women
      • A French awakening
      • Sheridan on border protection failure
      • Reichsburg
      • Peillon's conceit
      • Homosexuals are better parents?
      • The state drifts ever closer in Scotland
      • Some marriage research
      • Sydney Traditionalist Forum update
      • "The West has lost all capacity for self-love"
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (19)
    • ►  March (21)
    • ►  February (16)
    • ►  January (22)
  • ►  2012 (225)
    • ►  December (15)
    • ►  November (14)
    • ►  October (20)
    • ►  September (19)
    • ►  August (18)
    • ►  July (20)
    • ►  June (19)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (27)
    • ►  March (19)
    • ►  February (14)
    • ►  January (21)
  • ►  2011 (89)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (15)
    • ►  October (17)
    • ►  September (17)
    • ►  August (15)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile